- born 78145500 seconds after the epoch (which is 1972-06-23 MEST 13:05 for you ctime-deficient)
- Austrian by chance, now living in Australia by choice
- classic hacker in appearance and habit
- graduate of the Technical University of Vienna (with the degree of "Dipl.-Ing. Tech. Math." which is somewhere between a "masters" degree in computer science and/or mathematics and a full PhD) and recently of Bond Uni (with a PhD).
- now gainfully employed at a place rivalling the Australian International University.
- sysadmin, security consultant, developer etc.
This is not my resume; if you need one please ask. - and lots of other things no one cares about to know...but if you do, have a look in the interests section.
Mind you, both the URL as well as the email are close to the edge of what the standards allow. So far none of the spammer scraping engines has had sufficient clue to use these links. The same is true for Outhouse, I'm being told by friends. Well, that's GOOD: get yourself a Real Mail Program if you need to communicate with me!
If you need to contact me, send me an email.
My address consists of the local component az+no+fscking+spam and
the domain-part should be snafu.priv.at. No idea what I'm talking
about? Read the relevant standards document, then.
If possible use GnuPG and encrypt+sign your message; see my crypto comms page for details.
What only stupid spammers do is to try this mail link.
More about SNAFU & co can be found in the Jargon File.
(more...)
If there ever happen to be enough people wanting to "discuss" (*snort*) my posts, I'll set up a private hierarchy on my newsbox and off we go.
For now there's this shiny comment link in the right bottom corner of every post. It serves as a RFC-stress test for your web browser / email client installation, which is a Very Good Thing; think of Darwin at work in the IT arena.
This is a valid, RFC2822-compliant email address:
`yes`=no*&|.{maybe'?#}$^}@snafu.priv.at
It also exists and leads to me, which is the sole point of email.
I've tried hard to trample on all the badly programmed dataminers' buttons
- hard, but without breaking the RFCs. Sneaking this thing
through the shell's quoting for something like /usr/lib/sendmail -bv is lotsa fun...
My other, similarly built email addy for usenet use doesn't get spammed ever,
so chances are good that this will keep out some of the idiots.
Then there is this; a valid and possible but not existing email address,
which happens to be what the HTML quoting rules require/allow to be the
representation of the above in a mailto url:
%60yes%60%3Dno*%26%7C.%7Bmaybe'%3F%23%7D%24%5E%7D@snafu.priv.at
And finally, there's the way mailto: urls can be built. Nobody says that
the target address has to be the first thing in there.
Which leads us to this contact thing (wrapped):
mailto:?subject=comment%20something@snafu.priv.at
&to=%60yes%60%3Dno*%26%7C.%7Bmaybe'%3F%23%7D%24%5E%7D%40snafu.priv.at
It's legal. It works. It's ugly. I'm happy. (I won't tell you how much time
I've wasted concocting this abomination, though. exmh, btw, barfs on
that thing; ah, another bug to fix...)
In general and because it's true: HTML stinks. Its excuse for quoting reeks of puke. XML and SGML fester by design. Still, even a piece of rotting garbage can be good for a laugh at times.
Now there is a search function (the form is on the left below the links). Crude, ht://Dig-based but sufficient.
